On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:31, Torbjorn SVENSSON < torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Is it okay to backport 62b29347c38394ae32858f2301aa9aa65205984e, > 2a4d9e4f533c77870cc0eb60fbbd8047da4c7386 and > ba0cde8ba2d93b7193050eb5ef3cc6f7a2cdfe61 to releases/gcc-13? > > Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi: > > FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/compare_exchange_padding.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_ref/compare_exchange_padding.cc (test for excess > errors) > Yes, OK > > Kind regards, > Torbjörn > > On 2023-10-13 00:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 17:11 Jeff Law, <jeffreya...@gmail.com > > <mailto:jeffreya...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/12/23 08:38, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > LGTM but I'm not a maintainer ;-) > > LGTM to as well -- I usually try to stay out of libstdc++, but this > > looks simple enough. Both patches in this series are OK. > > > > > > Thanks for stepping in, Jeff. The patches are indeed fine, I'm just > > offline due to circumstances beyond my control. I hope normal service > > will resume soon. > > > > > >
