Hi,
Is it okay to backport 62b29347c38394ae32858f2301aa9aa65205984e,
2a4d9e4f533c77870cc0eb60fbbd8047da4c7386 and
ba0cde8ba2d93b7193050eb5ef3cc6f7a2cdfe61 to releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/compare_exchange_padding.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_ref/compare_exchange_padding.cc (test for excess
errors)
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2023-10-13 00:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 17:11 Jeff Law, <jeffreya...@gmail.com
<mailto:jeffreya...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 10/12/23 08:38, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> LGTM but I'm not a maintainer ;-)
LGTM to as well -- I usually try to stay out of libstdc++, but this
looks simple enough. Both patches in this series are OK.
Thanks for stepping in, Jeff. The patches are indeed fine, I'm just
offline due to circumstances beyond my control. I hope normal service
will resume soon.
