Hi! Yet another spot where we need to treat VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR differently from NOP_EXPR/CONVERT_EXPR.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2024-01-31 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/113639 * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (bitint_large_huge::handle_operand_addr): For VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR set rhs1 to its operand. * gcc.dg/bitint-79.c: New test. --- gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc.jj 2024-01-27 13:06:49.183671155 +0100 +++ gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc 2024-01-30 17:06:56.829144801 +0100 @@ -2159,6 +2159,8 @@ bitint_large_huge::handle_operand_addr ( gcc_assert (gimple_assign_cast_p (g)); tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (g); bitint_prec_kind kind = bitint_prec_small; + if (TREE_CODE (rhs1) == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR) + rhs1 = TREE_OPERAND (rhs1, 0); gcc_assert (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rhs1))); if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (rhs1)) == BITINT_TYPE) kind = bitint_precision_kind (TREE_TYPE (rhs1)); --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-79.c.jj 2024-01-30 17:18:50.711135054 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-79.c 2024-01-30 17:18:22.986524397 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* PR tree-optimization/113639 */ +/* { dg-do compile { target bitint } } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c23" } */ + +int j, k; +#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 162 +struct S { _BitInt(162) n; }; +void bar (_BitInt(162) x); + +void +foo (struct S s) +{ + bar (s.n * j); + (void) (s.n * k); +} +#endif Jakub