On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 14:55 +0800, Yang Yujie wrote: > +#define ISA_HAS_FRECIPE \ > + (la_target.isa.evolution & OPTION_MASK_ISA_FRECIPE) > +#define ISA_HAS_DIV32 \ > + (la_target.isa.evolution & OPTION_MASK_ISA_DIV32) > +#define ISA_HAS_LAM_BH \ > + (la_target.isa.evolution & OPTION_MASK_ISA_LAM_BH) > +#define ISA_HAS_LAMCAS \ > + (la_target.isa.evolution & OPTION_MASK_ISA_LAM_BH) > +#define ISA_HAS_LD_SEQ_SA \ > + (la_target.isa.evolution & OPTION_MASK_ISA_LD_SEQ_SA)
Should every occurrence of TARGET_DIV32 etc. be replaced with ISA_HAS_DIV32 etc. in the code base? It seems some of them are not replaced. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
