On May 25, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > Diego and I looked long and hard at this issue. It all came down > to a sequence of problems. First, libstdc++ isn't rigged for GTY,
If portability to other C++ compilers wasn't a concern, we could extend out g++ to make supporting GTY better, so that we can simplify and refine the GTY stuff. I fear we need some light weight reflection, might make a nice language feature for a future C++ standard, if done well.
