On 9/18/23 04:00, Robin Dapp wrote:
I must be missing something. Doesn't insn 10 broadcast the immediate
0x2 to both elements of r142?!? What am I missing?
It is indeed a bit misleading. The difference is in the mask which
is not displayed in the short form. So we actually use a vec_dup
for a single-element move, essentially a masked vec_dup where only
one element is masked in.
Ah :-)
The problem was that the original doesn't use a merging "vec_set"
but a "destructive" one where the other elements get ignored.
The fix is OK IMHO.
Agreed.
jeff
