On 12 May 2012 20:15, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 05/12/2012 07:51 PM, Manuel López-Ibáńez wrote: >> >> It seems very conservative also to me. I think the code should just >> unconditionally recurse on the operands of COND_EXPR. The recursion >> should then take care of the casts. So then c = b ? c : i; will warn >> about 'i', not about the whole conditional expression. >> >> Did you find any issues with doing: > > I didn't, but really I couldn't spend enough time on this issue. There are > too many tiny details I don't know how exactly we want to handle. I think > I'm going to unassign myself and hope that you are willing to finish up the > work. >
Pity, I don't really have time to work on this. I want to fix the group options mess and issues with the caret for GCC 4.8. Thanks for trying, Manuel.
