Hi Maxim, Adding Jeff to CC who is the official gcc-patches mailinglist admin.
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:08 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Normally, notifications from Linaro TCWG precommit CI are sent only to > patch author and patch submitter. In this case the sender was rewritten > to "Benjamin Priour via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>", > which was detected by Patchwork [1] as patch submitter. BTW. Really looking forward to your talk at Cauldron about this! > Is "From:" re-write on gcc-patches@ mailing list a side-effect of [2]? > I see that some, but not all messages to gcc-patches@ have their > "From:" re-written. > > Also, do you know if re-write of "From:" on gcc-patches@ is expected? Yes, it is expected for emails that come from domains with a dmarc policy. That is because the current settings of the gcc-patches mailinglist might slightly alter the message or headers in a way that invalidates the DKIM signature. Without From rewriting those messages would be bounced by recipients that check the dmarc policy/dkim signature. As you noticed the glibc hackers have recently worked together with the sourceware overseers to upgrade mailman and alter the postfix and the libc-alpha mailinglist setting so it doesn't require From rewriting anymore (the message and header aren't altered anymore to invalidate the DKIM signatures). We (Jeff or anyone else with mailman admin privs) could use the same settings for gcc-patches. The settings that need to be set are in that bug: - subject_prefix (general): (empty) - from_is_list (general): No - anonymous_list (general): No - first_strip_reply_to (general): No - reply_goes_to_list (general): Poster - reply_to_address (general): (empty) - include_sender_header (general): No - drop_cc (general): No - msg_header (nondigest): (empty) - msg_footer (nondigest): (empty) - scrub_nondigest (nondigest): No - dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Accept - filter_content (contentfilter): No The only visible change (apart from no more From rewriting) is that HTML multi-parts aren't scrubbed anymore (that would be a message altering issue). The html part is still scrubbed from the inbox.sourceware.org archive, so b4 works just fine. But I don't know what patchwork.sourceware.org does with HTML attachements. Of course people really shouldn't sent HTML attachments to gcc-patches, so maybe this is no real problem. Let me know if you want Jeff (or me or one of the other overseers) make the above changes to the gcc-patches mailman settings. Cheers, Mark > [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/ > [2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29713
