On 8/25/23 12:44, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --

This CWG clarifies that designated initializer support direct-initialization.
Just be careful what Note 2 in [dcl.init.aggr]/4.2 says: "If the
initialization is by designated-initializer-clause, its form determines
whether copy-initialization or direct-initialization is performed."  Hence
this patch sets CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT only when we are dealing with
".x{}", but not ".x = {}".

        PR c++/91319

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * parser.cc (cp_parser_initializer_list): Set CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT
        when the designated initializer is of the .x{} form.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp2a/desig30.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/parser.cc                     |  6 ++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig30.C | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig30.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index eeb22e44fb4..b3d5c65b469 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -25718,6 +25718,7 @@ cp_parser_initializer_list (cp_parser* parser, bool* 
non_constant_p,
        tree designator;
        tree initializer;
        bool clause_non_constant_p;
+      bool direct_p = false;
        location_t loc = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->location;
/* Handle the C++20 syntax, '. id ='. */
@@ -25740,6 +25741,8 @@ cp_parser_initializer_list (cp_parser* parser, bool* 
non_constant_p,
          if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_EQ))
            /* Consume the `='.  */
            cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+         else
+           direct_p = true;
        }
        /* Also, if the next token is an identifier and the following one is a
         colon, we are looking at the GNU designated-initializer
@@ -25817,6 +25820,9 @@ cp_parser_initializer_list (cp_parser* parser, bool* 
non_constant_p,
        if (clause_non_constant_p && non_constant_p)
        *non_constant_p = true;
+ if (TREE_CODE (initializer) == CONSTRUCTOR)
+       CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT (initializer) |= direct_p;

Why |= rather than = ?

Jason

Reply via email to