I change as follows:
(define_insn_and_split "*mov<mode>_mem_to_mem"
[(set (match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 0 "memory_operand")
(match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 1 "memory_operand"))]
"TARGET_VECTOR && can_create_pseudo_p ()"
"#"
"&& 1"
[(const_int 0)]
{
if (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<MODE>mode).to_constant () <= MAX_BITS_PER_WORD)
{
/* Opitmize the following case:
typedef int8_t v2qi __attribute__ ((vector_size (2)));
v2qi v = *(v2qi*)in;
*(v2qi*)out = v;
We prefer scalar load/store instead of vle.v/vse.v when
the VLS modes size is smaller scalar mode. */
machine_mode mode;
unsigned size = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<MODE>mode).to_constant ();
if (FLOAT_MODE_P (<MODE>mode))
mode = mode_for_size (size, MODE_FLOAT, 0).require ();
else
mode = mode_for_size (size, MODE_INT, 0).require ();
emit_move_insn (gen_lowpart (mode, operands[0]),
gen_lowpart (mode, operands[1]));
DONE;
}
else
operands[1] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[1]);
}
)
(define_insn_and_split "*mov<mode>"
[(set (match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 0 "reg_or_mem_operand" "=vr, m, vr")
(match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 1 "reg_or_mem_operand" " m,vr, vr"))]
"TARGET_VECTOR
&& (register_operand (operands[0], <MODE>mode)
|| register_operand (operands[1], <MODE>mode))"
"@
#
#
vmv%m1r.v\t%0,%1"
"&& reload_completed
&& (!register_operand (operands[0], <MODE>mode)
|| !register_operand (operands[1], <MODE>mode))"
[(const_int 0)]
{
bool ok_p = riscv_vector::legitimize_move (operands[0], operands[1]);
gcc_assert (ok_p);
DONE;
}
)
Is it reasonable to you?
[email protected]
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-07-27 17:57
To: [email protected]
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; Robin Dapp
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Enable basic VLS modes support
Hmmm, does it mean we'll have (set (mem) (mem)) after legitimize_move???
Or maybe try to
use define_insn_and_split rather than define_split for the (set (mem) (mem))
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 5:50 PM [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, kito.
> I tried to reject mem->mem in this pattern:
> (define_insn_and_split "*mov<mode>"
> [(set (match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 0 "reg_or_mem_operand" "=vr, m, vr")
> (match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 1 "reg_or_mem_operand" " m,vr, vr"))]
> "TARGET_VECTOR
> && (register_operand (operands[0], <MODE>mode)
> || register_operand (operands[1], <MODE>mode))"
> "@
> #
> #
> vmv%m1r.v\t%0,%1"
> "&& reload_completed
> && (!register_operand (operands[0], <MODE>mode)
> || !register_operand (operands[1], <MODE>mode))"
> [(const_int 0)]
> {
> bool ok_p = riscv_vector::legitimize_move (operands[0], operands[1]);
> gcc_assert (ok_p);
> DONE;
> }
> )
>
>
> It cause ICE in regression during "vregs" (Before RA).
> [jzzhong@server1:/work/home/jzzhong/work/insn]$~/work/rvv-opensource/output/gcc-rv64/bin/riscv64-rivai-elf-gcc
> -march=rv64gc_zve32f -mabi=lp64d -O3 -S
> --param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable -fdump-rtl-all auto.c
> auto.c: In function 'foo0':
> auto.c:15:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
> 15 | }
> | ^
> (insn 35 34 36 6 (set (mem:V8QI (reg/f:DI 154 [ _64 ]) [0 MEM <vector(8)
> signed char> [(int8_t *)_64]+0 S8 A64])
> (mem/u/c:V8QI (reg/f:DI 185) [0 S8 A64])) "auto.c":11:20 -1
> (nil))
> during RTL pass: vregs
> dump file: auto.c.259r.vregs
>
>
> It seems that we need a placeholder pattern to hold mem->mem ?
>
> Could you help me with that ?
> ________________________________
> [email protected]
>
>
> From: Kito Cheng
> Date: 2023-07-27 17:19
> To: Juzhe-Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Enable basic VLS modes support
> Last minor thing :)
>
> > +(define_insn_and_split "*mov<mode>"
> > + [(set (match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 0 "reg_or_mem_operand" "=vr, m, vr")
> > + (match_operand:VLS_AVL_IMM 1 "reg_or_mem_operand" " m,vr, vr"))]
> > + "TARGET_VECTOR"
>
> Reject (set (mem) (mem)) by adding the check:
>
> TARGET_VECTOR
> && (register_operand (operands[0], <VLS_AVL_REG:MODE>mode)
> || register_operand (operands[1], <VLS_AVL_REG:MODE>mode))"
>
