The testcase is miscompiled to this:

        ...
        movl    (%rsi), %ecx
        cmpl    %ecx, (%rdi)
        sbbl    %edx, %edx
        cmovbe  %edx, %eax
        ret

but sbbl only preserves the carry flag, not the zero flag.  I suppose
one could use different patterns with different CC modes, but this is
the safest fix.

Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for mainline?

I also reproduced this at least on 4.7; help would be welcome on
committing it to the branches.  Thanks in advance!

Paolo

2012-04-27  Paolo Bonzini  <bonz...@gnu.org>

        PR target/53138
        * config/i386/i386.md (x86_mov<mode>cc_0_m1_neg): Add clobber.

2012-04-27  Paolo Bonzini  <bonz...@gnu.org>

        PR target/53138
        * gcc.c-torture/execute/20120427-1.c: New testcase.

Index: config/i386/i386.md
===================================================================
--- config/i386/i386.md (revisione 186859)
+++ config/i386/i386.md (copia locale)
@@ -16439,7 +16439,8 @@
 (define_insn "*x86_mov<mode>cc_0_m1_neg"
   [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "register_operand" "=r")
        (neg:SWI48 (match_operator 1 "ix86_carry_flag_operator"
-                   [(reg FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0)])))]
+                   [(reg FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0)])))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
   ""
   "sbb{<imodesuffix>}\t%0, %0"
   [(set_attr "type" "alu")
Index: testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120427-1.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120427-1.c        (revisione 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120427-1.c        (revisione 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+typedef struct sreal
+{
+  unsigned sig;                /* Significant.  */
+  int exp;             /* Exponent.  */
+} sreal;
+
+sreal_compare (sreal *a, sreal *b)
+{
+  if (a->exp > b->exp)
+    return 1;
+  if (a->exp < b->exp)
+    return -1;
+  if (a->sig > b->sig)
+    return 1;
+  return -(a->sig < b->sig);
+}
+
+sreal a[] = {
+   { 0, 0 },
+   { 1, 0 },
+   { 0, 1 },
+   { 1, 1 }
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+  int i, j;
+  for (i = 0; i <= 3; i++) {
+    for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
+      if (i < j && sreal_compare(&a[i], &a[j]) != -1) abort();
+      if (i == j && sreal_compare(&a[i], &a[j]) != 0) abort();
+      if (i > j && sreal_compare(&a[i], &a[j]) != 1) abort();
+    }
+  }
+  return 0;
+}

Reply via email to