> -----Original Message----- > From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@arm.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 2:46 PM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>; > Richard Earnshaw <richard.earns...@arm.com>; Richard Sandiford > <richard.sandif...@arm.com> > Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@arm.com> > Subject: [PATCH 06/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] add > unspec_based_mve_function_exact_insn > > Introduce a function that will be used to build intrinsics which use > RTX codes for the non-predicated, no-mode version, and UNSPECS > otherwise. > Ok. Thanks, Kyrill > 2022-09-08 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@arm.com> > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h (class > unspec_based_mve_function_base): New. > (class unspec_based_mve_function_exact_insn): New. > --- > gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 186 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h > b/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h > index dff01999bcd..6d992b270b0 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h > @@ -39,6 +39,192 @@ public: > } > }; > > +/* An incomplete function_base for functions that have an associated > + rtx_code for signed integers, unsigned integers and floating-point > + values for the non-predicated, non-suffixed intrinsic, and unspec > + codes, with separate codes for signed integers, unsigned integers > + and floating-point values. The class simply records information > + about the mapping for derived classes to use. */ > +class unspec_based_mve_function_base : public function_base > +{ > +public: > + CONSTEXPR unspec_based_mve_function_base (rtx_code code_for_sint, > + rtx_code code_for_uint, > + rtx_code code_for_fp, > + int unspec_for_n_sint, > + int unspec_for_n_uint, > + int unspec_for_n_fp, > + int unspec_for_m_sint, > + int unspec_for_m_uint, > + int unspec_for_m_fp, > + int unspec_for_m_n_sint, > + int unspec_for_m_n_uint, > + int unspec_for_m_n_fp) > + : m_code_for_sint (code_for_sint), > + m_code_for_uint (code_for_uint), > + m_code_for_fp (code_for_fp), > + m_unspec_for_n_sint (unspec_for_n_sint), > + m_unspec_for_n_uint (unspec_for_n_uint), > + m_unspec_for_n_fp (unspec_for_n_fp), > + m_unspec_for_m_sint (unspec_for_m_sint), > + m_unspec_for_m_uint (unspec_for_m_uint), > + m_unspec_for_m_fp (unspec_for_m_fp), > + m_unspec_for_m_n_sint (unspec_for_m_n_sint), > + m_unspec_for_m_n_uint (unspec_for_m_n_uint), > + m_unspec_for_m_n_fp (unspec_for_m_n_fp) > + {} > + > + /* The rtx code to use for signed, unsigned integers and > + floating-point values respectively. */ > + rtx_code m_code_for_sint; > + rtx_code m_code_for_uint; > + rtx_code m_code_for_fp; > + > + /* The unspec code associated with signed-integer, unsigned-integer > + and floating-point operations respectively. It covers the cases > + with the _n suffix, and/or the _m predicate. */ > + int m_unspec_for_n_sint; > + int m_unspec_for_n_uint; > + int m_unspec_for_n_fp; > + int m_unspec_for_m_sint; > + int m_unspec_for_m_uint; > + int m_unspec_for_m_fp; > + int m_unspec_for_m_n_sint; > + int m_unspec_for_m_n_uint; > + int m_unspec_for_m_n_fp; > +}; > + > +/* Map the function directly to CODE (UNSPEC, M) where M is the vector > + mode associated with type suffix 0, except when there is no > + predicate and no _n suffix, in which case we use the appropriate > + rtx_code. This is useful when the basic operation is mapped to a > + standard RTX code and all other versions use different unspecs. */ > +class unspec_based_mve_function_exact_insn : public > unspec_based_mve_function_base > +{ > +public: > + CONSTEXPR unspec_based_mve_function_exact_insn (rtx_code > code_for_sint, > + rtx_code code_for_uint, > + rtx_code code_for_fp, > + int unspec_for_n_sint, > + int unspec_for_n_uint, > + int unspec_for_n_fp, > + int unspec_for_m_sint, > + int unspec_for_m_uint, > + int unspec_for_m_fp, > + int unspec_for_m_n_sint, > + int unspec_for_m_n_uint, > + int unspec_for_m_n_fp) > + : unspec_based_mve_function_base (code_for_sint, > + code_for_uint, > + code_for_fp, > + unspec_for_n_sint, > + unspec_for_n_uint, > + unspec_for_n_fp, > + unspec_for_m_sint, > + unspec_for_m_uint, > + unspec_for_m_fp, > + unspec_for_m_n_sint, > + unspec_for_m_n_uint, > + unspec_for_m_n_fp) > + {} > + > + rtx > + expand (function_expander &e) const override > + { > + /* No suffix, no predicate, use the right RTX code. */ > + if ((e.mode_suffix_id != MODE_n) > + && (e.pred == PRED_none)) > + return e.map_to_rtx_codes (m_code_for_sint, m_code_for_uint, > + m_code_for_fp); > + > + insn_code code; > + switch (e.pred) > + { > + case PRED_none: > + if (e.mode_suffix_id == MODE_n) > + /* No predicate, _n suffix. */ > + { > + if (e.type_suffix (0).integer_p) > + if (e.type_suffix (0).unsigned_p) > + code = code_for_mve_q_n (m_unspec_for_n_uint, > m_unspec_for_n_uint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_n (m_unspec_for_n_sint, > m_unspec_for_n_sint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_n_f (m_unspec_for_n_fp, e.vector_mode > (0)); > + > + return e.use_exact_insn (code); > + } > + gcc_unreachable (); > + break; > + > + case PRED_m: > + switch (e.mode_suffix_id) > + { > + case MODE_none: > + /* No suffix, "m" predicate. */ > + if (e.type_suffix (0).integer_p) > + if (e.type_suffix (0).unsigned_p) > + code = code_for_mve_q_m (m_unspec_for_m_uint, > m_unspec_for_m_uint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m (m_unspec_for_m_sint, > m_unspec_for_m_sint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_f (m_unspec_for_m_fp, > e.vector_mode (0)); > + break; > + > + case MODE_n: > + /* _n suffix, "m" predicate. */ > + if (e.type_suffix (0).integer_p) > + if (e.type_suffix (0).unsigned_p) > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_n (m_unspec_for_m_n_uint, > m_unspec_for_m_n_uint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_n (m_unspec_for_m_n_sint, > m_unspec_for_m_n_sint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_n_f (m_unspec_for_m_n_fp, > e.vector_mode (0)); > + break; > + > + default: > + gcc_unreachable (); > + } > + return e.use_cond_insn (code, 0); > + > + case PRED_x: > + switch (e.mode_suffix_id) > + { > + case MODE_none: > + /* No suffix, "x" predicate. */ > + if (e.type_suffix (0).integer_p) > + if (e.type_suffix (0).unsigned_p) > + code = code_for_mve_q_m (m_unspec_for_m_uint, > m_unspec_for_m_uint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m (m_unspec_for_m_sint, > m_unspec_for_m_sint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_f (m_unspec_for_m_fp, > e.vector_mode (0)); > + break; > + > + case MODE_n: > + /* _n suffix, "x" predicate. */ > + if (e.type_suffix (0).integer_p) > + if (e.type_suffix (0).unsigned_p) > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_n (m_unspec_for_m_n_uint, > m_unspec_for_m_n_uint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_n (m_unspec_for_m_n_sint, > m_unspec_for_m_n_sint, e.vector_mode (0)); > + else > + code = code_for_mve_q_m_n_f (m_unspec_for_m_n_fp, > e.vector_mode (0)); > + break; > + > + default: > + gcc_unreachable (); > + } > + return e.use_pred_x_insn (code); > + > + default: > + gcc_unreachable (); > + } > + > + gcc_unreachable (); > + } > +}; > + > } /* end namespace arm_mve */ > > /* Declare the global function base NAME, creating it from an instance > -- > 2.34.1
RE: [PATCH 06/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] add unspec_based_mve_function_exact_insn
Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches Tue, 02 May 2023 09:17:59 -0700
- RE: [PATCH 10/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 09/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] add bi... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 09/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 16/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] factor... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 16/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 19/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] factor... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 19/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 20/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] factor... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 20/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 06/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] add un... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 06/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 17/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] rework... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 17/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 21/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] factor... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 21/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 13/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] rework... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 13/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 11/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] rework... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 11/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 12/22] arm: [MVE intrinsics] add bi... Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
- RE: [PATCH 12/22] arm: [MVE intrinsic... Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches