> >
> > Actually on second thought, I think I can break this either by making
> > the wraping function to be thunk or alias or by moving it to different
> > compilation unit.
> > Also with LTO we will get body later.
> >
> > So I think we need to drop this optimization.
>
> It's the same condition guarding the set_{const,pure}_flag call earlier
> (but yes, I agree). So it isn't covered by the regression so we
> should address this for next stage1.
I will do that next stage1 then. This bug is mine and it there for a
long time (it doesn't even need LTO to reproduce).
So it may be regression relative to pre-tree-ssa gccs but fixing such bug can
wait for 13.2.
Honza
