On Apr 17, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: > Hi Tristan, > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Tristan Gingold <ging...@adacore.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> one-process methodology cannot be used on VMS[...] >> But, when twoprocess is selected, gcc emits a warning[...] >> Ok for trunk ? > >> diff --git a/fixincludes/configure.ac b/fixincludes/configure.ac >> index e7de791..f1fb2ff 100644 >> --- a/fixincludes/configure.ac >> +++ b/fixincludes/configure.ac >> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ fi], >> i?86-*-msdosdjgpp* | \ >> i?86-*-mingw32* | \ >> x86_64-*-mingw32* | \ >> - *-*-beos* ) >> + *-*-beos* | \ >> + *-*-*vms*) >> TARGET=twoprocess >> ;; > > This, definitely. > >> diff --git a/fixincludes/fixincl.c b/fixincludes/fixincl.c >> index 9f399ab..1133534 100644 >> --- a/fixincludes/fixincl.c >> +++ b/fixincludes/fixincl.c >> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ fix_with_system (tFixDesc* p_fixd, >> /* >> * Now add the fix number and file names that may be needed >> */ >> - sprintf (pz_scan, " %ld '%s' '%s'", (long) (p_fixd - fixDescList), >> + sprintf (pz_scan, " %ld '%s' '%s' '%s'", (long) (p_fixd - >> fixDescList), >> pz_fix_file, pz_file_source, pz_temp_file); >> } >> else /* NOT an "internal" fix: */ > > This, almost certainly. I'll take a peek at the source and convince myself of > this decade old mistake tomorrow & send my grateful thanks and approval then. > (No access to source today.)
Fine, I stay tuned. Tristan.
