> Am 04.01.2023 um 10:09 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>: > > Hi! > > We shouldn't narrow multiplications originally done in signed types, > because the original multiplication might overflow but the narrowed > one will be done in unsigned arithmetics and will never overflow. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? Ok. Richard > 2023-01-04 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR sanitizer/108256 > * convert.cc (do_narrow): Punt for MULT_EXPR if original > type doesn't wrap around and -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow > is on. > * fold-const.cc (fold_unary_loc) <CASE_CONVERT>: Likewise. > > * c-c++-common/ubsan/pr108256.c: New test. > > --- gcc/convert.cc.jj 2023-01-02 09:32:25.123245723 +0100 > +++ gcc/convert.cc 2023-01-03 10:02:36.309706050 +0100 > @@ -384,6 +384,14 @@ do_narrow (location_t loc, > && sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_SI_OVERFLOW)) > return NULL_TREE; > > + /* Similarly for multiplication, but in that case it can be > + problematic even if typex is unsigned type - 0xffff * 0xffff > + overflows in int. */ > + if (ex_form == MULT_EXPR > + && !TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (TREE_TYPE (expr)) > + && sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_SI_OVERFLOW)) > + return NULL_TREE; > + > /* But now perhaps TYPEX is as wide as INPREC. > In that case, do nothing special here. > (Otherwise would recurse infinitely in convert. */ > --- gcc/fold-const.cc.jj 2023-01-02 09:32:32.756135438 +0100 > +++ gcc/fold-const.cc 2023-01-03 10:30:05.492239455 +0100 > @@ -9574,7 +9574,9 @@ fold_unary_loc (location_t loc, enum tre > if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) > && TREE_CODE (op0) == MULT_EXPR > && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0)) > - && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (op0))) > + && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (op0)) > + && (TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (TREE_TYPE (op0)) > + || !sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_SI_OVERFLOW))) > { > /* Be careful not to introduce new overflows. */ > tree mult_type; > --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr108256.c.jj 2023-01-03 > 10:14:49.064284638 +0100 > +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr108256.c 2023-01-03 > 10:43:58.838326443 +0100 > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > +/* PR sanitizer/108256 */ > +/* { dg-do run { target { lp64 || ilp32 } } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow" } */ > + > +unsigned short > +foo (unsigned short x, unsigned short y) > +{ > + return x * y; > +} > + > +unsigned short > +bar (unsigned short x, unsigned short y) > +{ > + int r = x * y; > + return r; > +} > + > +int > +main () > +{ > + volatile unsigned short a = foo (0xffff, 0xffff); > + volatile unsigned short b = bar (0xfffe, 0xfffe); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* { dg-output "signed integer overflow: 65535 \\\* 65535 cannot be > represented in type 'int'\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ > +/* { dg-output "\[^\n\r]*signed integer overflow: 65534 \\\* 65534 cannot be > represented in type 'int'" } */ > > Jakub >
Re: [PATCH] ubsan: Avoid narrowing of multiply for -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow [PR108256]
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches Wed, 04 Jan 2023 01:19:32 -0800
- [PATCH] ubsan: Avoid narrowing of multiply ... Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] ubsan: Avoid narrowing of ... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches