The gimple generated by riscv is identical to that of powerpc64 currently. It seems like the change at r12-4790-4b3a325f07acebf47e82de227ce1d5ba62f5bcae also affected riscv64 like powerpc64 and cris.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c: Xfail for riscv64 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c index 53c4a5399ea..843f5323713 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int foo (int n, int l, int m, int r) if (l > 100) if ( (n <= 9) && (m < 100) && (r < 19) ) - blah(v); /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" "bogus warning" { xfail powerpc64*-*-* cris-*-* } } */ + blah(v); /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" "bogus warning" { xfail powerpc64*-*-* cris-*-* riscv64*-*-* } */ if ( (n <= 8) && (m < 99) && (r < 19) ) blah(v); /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" "pr101674" { xfail mmix-*-* } } */ -- 2.25.1