On 11/13/22 16:05, Christoph Muellner wrote:
From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
Let's try to not accumulate too much functionality in one single file
as this does not really help maintaining or extending the code.
So in order to add more similar functionality like riscv_block_move_loop
let's move this function to a separate file.
This change does not do any functional changes.
It does modify a single line in the existing code,
that check_GNU_style.py complained about.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config.gcc: Add new object riscv-string.o
* config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (riscv_expand_block_move): Remove
duplicated prototype and move to new section for
riscv-string.cc.
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_block_move_straight): Remove function.
(riscv_adjust_block_mem): Likewise.
(riscv_block_move_loop): Likewise.
(riscv_expand_block_move): Likewise.
* config/riscv/riscv.md (cpymemsi): Move to new section for
riscv-string.cc.
* config/riscv/t-riscv: Add compile rule for riscv-string.o
* config/riscv/riscv-string.c: New file.
OK. Note I suspect the commit hooks are going to complain about your
ChangeLog formatting.
jeff
