On 11/13/22 16:05, Christoph Muellner wrote:
From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
INSNs are usually postfixed by a number representing the argument count.
Given the instructions will be used in a later commit, let's make them
visible, but add a "riscv_" prefix to avoid conflicts with standard
INSNs.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/bitmanip.md (*<optab>_not<mode>): Rename INSN.
(riscv_<optab>_not<mode>3): Rename INSN.
(*xor_not<mode>): Rename INSN.
(xor_not<mode>3): Rename INSN.
Not strictly necessary, but given how often I've seen ports expose an
insn with a standard name, but ever so slightly different semantics and
the ensuing code correctness issues, I like the idea of prefixing.
OK
jeff
