On 11/14/22 08:32, Arnaud Charlet wrote: >>>>>> Sorry for the breakage. However, I contacted you (and your colleague) >>>>>> and haven't received >>>>>> any feedback for a couple of weeks. >>>>> >>>>> Right although I did give you feedback that what you sent wasn’t in a >>>>> suitable form for review wrt Ada. >>>> >>>> Sure, but sending a patch set to gcc-patches wouldn't have worked either, >>>> we've got quite a strict >>>> email size limit. > > Note that the Ada part should have been quite limited in size given that the > doc was already in .rst format, which is why I was expecting a smaller patch > to review on the Ada side.
Yes, I made basically folder shuffling of the Ada files, but the .rst files itself were mainly untouched. Plus, these was ambition having baseconf.py which would set-up common settings for all Sphinx manuals. > >>>> Anyway, hope the AdaCore build would be fixable with a reasonable amount >>>> of effort? >>> >>> Unclear yet. We'll probably need to change and possibly partially revert the >>> Ada changes, we'll see. >> >> Hello. >> >> Note the Sphinx changes will be reverted today: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-November/239983.html >> >> Sorry for your extra work. > > Understood, thanks for your efforts and sorry you had to revert. Thank you. > > Clearly a change which requires a bleeding edge version of sphinx cannot be > pushed at this stage, that's premature. Yes, depending on bleeding edge version was of one the problem. Cheers, Martin > > Cheers, > > Arno
