The diagnostic code can end up with zero sized array elements
with T[][0] and the wide-int code nicely avoids exceptions when
dividing by zero in one codepath but not in another. The following
fixes the exception by using wide-int in both paths.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
PR tree-optimization/106189
* gimple-array-bounds.cc (array_bounds_checker::check_mem_ref):
Divide using offset_ints.
* gcc.dg/pr106189.c: New testcase.
---
gcc/gimple-array-bounds.cc | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106189.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106189.c
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-array-bounds.cc b/gcc/gimple-array-bounds.cc
index 0b48bdb0ae5..e190b93aa85 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-array-bounds.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-array-bounds.cc
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ array_bounds_checker::check_mem_ref (location_t location,
tree ref,
int i = 0;
if (aref.offmax[i] < -aref.sizrng[1] || aref.offmax[i = 1] > ubound)
{
- HOST_WIDE_INT tmpidx = aref.offmax[i].to_shwi () / eltsize.to_shwi ();
+ HOST_WIDE_INT tmpidx = (aref.offmax[i] / eltsize).to_shwi ();
if (warning_at (location, OPT_Warray_bounds,
"intermediate array offset %wi is outside array bounds "
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106189.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106189.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0eca8343c56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106189.c
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -Warray-bounds=2 -w" } */
+
+int a_n_0_0_a[][0];
+void a_n_0_0() { T(((char *)a_n_0_0_a)[1]); }
--
2.35.3
