On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 at 21:06, François Dumont <frs.dum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I knew you were going to ask for it but was to impatient to propose > those patches to wait anymore.
Heh, OK :-) I've started reviewing them, but I thought I'd ask that question first. > > Attached you'll find what I start to work on. But I am quite > disappointed by the results. At least it's showing that results are not > worst. > > To be honest I was also hoping some feedback from potential users > interesting in testing those patches. And maybe there are some well > known (and free) benches that I could challenge ? I don't know of any, sorry :-( It would be very useful to have a good set of std::lib benchmarking tests. https://github.com/hiraditya/std-benchmark does have a umap.cpp test but it's *very* basic (like most of the tests there - that project only seems to have good benchmarks for strings).
