On Wed, 11 May 2022, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
> LGTM, I think document what we really did in GCC 12 is never too late :P
Totally. And thanks for doing this, Palmer.
I went ahead and made two editorial changes per the patch below
which I pushed.
Gerald
commit 87fb03bc6ce3e190ba74215a9aad5021e263185a
Author: Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
Date: Sun May 22 00:23:09 2022 +0200
gcc-12: Editorial changes for RISC-V
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
index 0eae78ff..3b94378e 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
@@ -817,8 +817,8 @@ function Multiply (S1, S2 : Sign) return Sign is
support architecture testing marco and <code>-march=</code>
parsing.</li>
<li>The option <code>-mtune=thead-c906</code> is added to tune for T-HEAD
c906 cores.</li>
- <li>libstdc++'s no longer attempts to detect built-in atomics,
- distributions that have out-of-tree workarounds for
+ <li>libstdc++ no longer attempts to detect built-in atomics.
+ Distributions that have out-of-tree workarounds for
<code>-latomic</code> should check their ABIs again.</li>
</li>
</ul>
