LGTM, I think document what we really did in GCC 12 is never too late :P


On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:23 AM Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> ---
> IMO this one is worth documenting too, not sure if it's too late for
> gcc-12's docs (due to those branch commits) so I haven't committed it
> yet to avoid any fallout.
> ---
>  htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
> index e9f132c0..e8a9cea2 100644
> --- a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
> +++ b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
> @@ -746,6 +746,9 @@ function Multiply (S1, S2 : Sign) return Sign is
>         support architecture testing marco and <code>-march=</code> 
> parsing.</li>
>      <li>The option <code>-mtune=thead-c906</code> is added to tune for T-HEAD
>         c906 cores.</li>
> +    <li>libstdc++'s no longer attempts to detect built-in atomics,
> +       distributions that have out-of-tree workarounds for
> +       <code>-latomic</code> should check their ABIs again.</li>
>    </li>
>  </ul>
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Reply via email to