This test is executed in both C and C++ modes, lines 98 and 100 pass in C++ and are xfail in C.
This results in similar lines in gcc.sum and g++.sum, differing by the PASS or XFAIL prefix, which confuses compare_test: it reports these tests twice, as "now fail, but worked before" and "now work, but didn't before". To make the diagnostic different betweek C and C++, I use $tool in the dg-error comment field. 2022-05-06 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@arm.com> gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c: Make diagnostic unique. --- .../gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c index 621666ce6c9..95be60591fb 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ f (int c) fb = sb; (void) (c ? sb : sb); - (void) (c ? sb : fb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types} "" { xfail c } } + (void) (c ? sb : fb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types} "$tool" { xfail c } } - (void) (c ? fb : sb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types} "" { xfail c } } + (void) (c ? fb : sb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types} "$tool" { xfail c } } (void) (c ? fb : fb); } -- 2.25.1