On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 18:47 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> 
> 
> > Am 28.02.2022 um 16:31 schrieb David Malcolm via Gcc-patches <
> > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 12:49 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> > > Use flag_checking instead of CHECKING_P
> > > and run toplev::finalize only if there is not error seen.
> > > 
> > > Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression
> > > tests.
> > 
> > Did the testing include the libgccjit test suite?  ("jit" is not in -
> > -
> > enable-languages=all)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Ready to be installed?
> > 
> > I'm not keen on this change; IIRC it's valid to attempt to compile a
> > gcc_jit_context that fails with an error, and then to attempt a
> > different gcc_jit_context that succeeds, within the same process.  If
> > I'm reading the patch right, the patch as written removes this
> > cleanup,
> > which would thwart that.
> > 
> > I can try to cook up a testcase for the above use case.
> > 
> > Is there another way to fix PR 104648?
> 
> The function was never called on a release checking build btw.  Is
> there something like flag_jit one could test?

Sorry, I was misremembering - with libgccjit, toplev.finalize () is
called from playback::context::compile in jit/jit-playback.cc, not here
from main.cc

So this cleanup would still be called for libgccjit, and the patch
doesn't affect that.

Looking at PR ipa/104648, it seems to only be triggerable from the C++
frontend, so can't affect libgccjit.

So I think the patch is OK; sorry for the noise.
Dave


> 
> > Thanks
> > Dave
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Martin
> > > 
> > >         PR ipa/104648
> > > 
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > > 
> > >         * main.cc (main): Use flag_checking instead of CHECKING_P
> > >         and run toplev::finalize only if there is not error seen.
> > > 
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > > 
> > >         * g++.dg/pr104648.C: New test.
> > > ---
> > >   gcc/main.cc                     | 6 +++---
> > >   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C | 9 +++++++++
> > >   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/gcc/main.cc b/gcc/main.cc
> > > index f9dd6b2af58..4ba28b7de53 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/main.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/main.cc
> > > @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> > >                  true /* init_signals */);
> > >   
> > >     int r = toplev.main (argc, argv);
> > > -#if CHECKING_P
> > > -  toplev.finalize ();
> > > -#endif
> > > +
> > > +  if (flag_checking && !seen_error ())
> > > +    toplev.finalize ();
> > >   
> > >     return r;
> > >   }
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..b8b7c2864cf
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > > +// { dg-do compile }
> > > +// { dg-options "-fvtable-verify=preinit" }
> > > +
> > > +struct A {};
> > > +struct B : virtual A
> > > +{
> > > +  B () {};
> > > +  B () {}; /* { dg-error "cannot be overloaded with" } */
> > > +};
> > 
> > 
> 


Reply via email to