> Am 28.02.2022 um 16:31 schrieb David Malcolm via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>: > > On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 12:49 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: >> Use flag_checking instead of CHECKING_P >> and run toplev::finalize only if there is not error seen. >> >> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression >> tests. > > Did the testing include the libgccjit test suite? ("jit" is not in -- > enable-languages=all) > >> >> Ready to be installed? > > I'm not keen on this change; IIRC it's valid to attempt to compile a > gcc_jit_context that fails with an error, and then to attempt a > different gcc_jit_context that succeeds, within the same process. If > I'm reading the patch right, the patch as written removes this cleanup, > which would thwart that. > > I can try to cook up a testcase for the above use case. > > Is there another way to fix PR 104648? The function was never called on a release checking build btw. Is there something like flag_jit one could test? > Thanks > Dave > > > >> Thanks, >> Martin >> >> PR ipa/104648 >> >> gcc/ChangeLog: >> >> * main.cc (main): Use flag_checking instead of CHECKING_P >> and run toplev::finalize only if there is not error seen. >> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> >> * g++.dg/pr104648.C: New test. >> --- >> gcc/main.cc | 6 +++--- >> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C | 9 +++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C >> >> diff --git a/gcc/main.cc b/gcc/main.cc >> index f9dd6b2af58..4ba28b7de53 100644 >> --- a/gcc/main.cc >> +++ b/gcc/main.cc >> @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv) >> true /* init_signals */); >> >> int r = toplev.main (argc, argv); >> -#if CHECKING_P >> - toplev.finalize (); >> -#endif >> + >> + if (flag_checking && !seen_error ()) >> + toplev.finalize (); >> >> return r; >> } >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C >> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000000..b8b7c2864cf >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr104648.C >> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ >> +// { dg-do compile } >> +// { dg-options "-fvtable-verify=preinit" } >> + >> +struct A {}; >> +struct B : virtual A >> +{ >> + B () {}; >> + B () {}; /* { dg-error "cannot be overloaded with" } */ >> +}; > >
Re: [PATCH] Fix error recovery in toplev::finalize.
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches Mon, 28 Feb 2022 09:47:28 -0800
- [PATCH] Fix error recovery in toplev::final... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Fix error recovery in topl... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] Fix error recovery in topl... David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] Fix error recovery in ... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] Fix error recovery... David Malcolm via Gcc-patches