On 2/8/22 03:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I've added the assert because start_decl diagnoses such vars for C++20 and
earlier:
if (current_function_decl && VAR_P (decl)
&& DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (current_function_decl)
&& cxx_dialect < cxx23)
but as can be seen, we cam trigger the assert in older standards e.g. during
non-manifestly constant evaluation. Rather than refining the assert that
DECL_EXPRs for such vars don't appear for C++20 and older if they are inside
of functions declared constexpr this patch just removes the assert, the
code rejects encountering those vars in constant expressions anyway.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
2022-02-08 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR c++/104403
* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_constant_expression): Don't assert DECL_EXPRs
of TREE_STATIC vars may only appear in -std=c++23.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-104403.C: New test.
--- gcc/cp/constexpr.cc.jj 2022-02-06 11:16:22.353814431 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/constexpr.cc 2022-02-07 11:38:59.131165171 +0100
@@ -6652,7 +6652,6 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const cons
/* Allow __FUNCTION__ etc. */
&& !DECL_ARTIFICIAL (r))
{
- gcc_assert (cxx_dialect >= cxx23);
if (!ctx->quiet)
{
if (CP_DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (r))
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-104403.C.jj 2022-02-07
11:40:32.760847269 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-104403.C 2022-02-07
11:40:06.109223079 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// PR c++/104403
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ []{ switch (0) { case 0: static int value; return &value; } };
+}
Jakub
