Hi! I've added the assert because start_decl diagnoses such vars for C++20 and earlier: if (current_function_decl && VAR_P (decl) && DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (current_function_decl) && cxx_dialect < cxx23) but as can be seen, we cam trigger the assert in older standards e.g. during non-manifestly constant evaluation. Rather than refining the assert that DECL_EXPRs for such vars don't appear for C++20 and older if they are inside of functions declared constexpr this patch just removes the assert, the code rejects encountering those vars in constant expressions anyway.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2022-02-08 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/104403 * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_constant_expression): Don't assert DECL_EXPRs of TREE_STATIC vars may only appear in -std=c++23. * g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-104403.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/constexpr.cc.jj 2022-02-06 11:16:22.353814431 +0100 +++ gcc/cp/constexpr.cc 2022-02-07 11:38:59.131165171 +0100 @@ -6652,7 +6652,6 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const cons /* Allow __FUNCTION__ etc. */ && !DECL_ARTIFICIAL (r)) { - gcc_assert (cxx_dialect >= cxx23); if (!ctx->quiet) { if (CP_DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (r)) --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-104403.C.jj 2022-02-07 11:40:32.760847269 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-104403.C 2022-02-07 11:40:06.109223079 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +// PR c++/104403 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +int +main () +{ + []{ switch (0) { case 0: static int value; return &value; } }; +} Jakub