On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 15:29:57 -0400
Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/6/21 14:28, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:32:26AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:  

> > No, I want q to point into the copy of the string, since I'm about
> > to modify it.  And I'd prefer a single call to xstrdup rather than
> > two.  
> 
> It occurs to me that instead of calling xstrdup at all, since you're 
> already passing the strings to get_identifier you could use 
> get_identifier_with_length instead, and then refer to IDENTIFIER_POINTER 
> of the result.

Right, i should have looked at the full diff.
I can see the point in stripping __attr__ to attr but also stripping
the vendors sounds a bit odd, doesn't it.

IMHO it would have been way easier to just calculate the desired start
and end and get_identifier_with_length for the vendor and attr as Jason
said.

Guess these local lambdas are a thing nowadays :)

Sorry for the noise..

Reply via email to