> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe LYON <christophe.l...@foss.st.com>
> Sent: 23 August 2021 10:41
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix __arm_vctp16q return type in arm_mve.h
>
>
> On 23/08/2021 11:30, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-
> >> bounces+kyrylo.tkachov=arm....@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of
> Christophe
> >> Lyon via Gcc-patches
> >> Sent: 16 August 2021 14:13
> >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix __arm_vctp16q return type in arm_mve.h
> >>
> >> __arm_vctp16q actually returns mve_pred16_t rather than int64_t.
> >>
> > Ok. Does this need a backport?
>
>
> Good point. I think so: branches gcc-10 and gcc-11 are affected, gcc-9
> did not support MVE yet.
Ok, please backport it wherever it's needed.
Thanks,
Kyrill
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Kyrill
> >
> >> 2021-08-16 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@foss.st.com>
> >>
> >> gcc/
> >> * config/arm/arm_mve.h: Fix __arm_vctp16q return type.
> >> ---
> >> gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
> >> index 83f10036990..e04d46218d0 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
> >> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
> >> @@ -3524,7 +3524,7 @@ __arm_vaddlvq_u32 (uint32x4_t __a)
> >> return __builtin_mve_vaddlvq_uv4si (__a);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -__extension__ extern __inline int64_t
> >> +__extension__ extern __inline mve_pred16_t
> >> __attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__))
> >> __arm_vctp16q (uint32_t __a)
> >> {
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
