On 8/12/2021 8:34 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 11:48 AM Aldy Hernandez <[email protected]> wrote:At this point I don't see any use for the legacy mode, which I had originally left in place during the transition. This patch removes the legacy back threader, and cleans up the code a bit. There are no functional changes to the non-legacy code. Tested on x86-64 Linux. OK? gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/invoke.texi: Remove docs for threader-mode param. * flag-types.h (enum threader_mode): Remove. * params.opt: Remove threader-mode param. * tree-ssa-threadbackward.c (class back_threader): Remove path_is_unreachable_p. Make find_paths private. Add maybe_thread and thread_through_all_blocks. Remove reference marker for m_registry. Remove reference marker for m_profit. (back_threader::back_threader): Adjust for registry and profit not being references. (dump_path): Move down. (debug): Move down. (class thread_jumps): Remove. (class back_threader_registry): Remove m_all_paths. Remove destructor. (thread_jumps::thread_through_all_blocks): Move to back_threader class. (fsm_find_thread_path): Remove (back_threader::maybe_thread): New. (back_threader::thread_through_all_blocks): Move from thread_jumps. (back_threader_registry::back_threader_registry): Remove m_all_paths. (back_threader_registry::~back_threader_registry): Remove. (thread_jumps::find_taken_edge): Remove. (thread_jumps::check_subpath_and_update_thread_path): Remove. (thread_jumps::maybe_register_path): Remove. (thread_jumps::handle_phi): Remove. (handle_assignment_p): Remove. (thread_jumps::handle_assignment): Remove. (thread_jumps::fsm_find_control_statement_thread_paths): Remove. (thread_jumps::find_jump_threads_backwards): Remove. (thread_jumps::find_jump_threads_backwards_with_ranger): Remove. (try_thread_blocks): Rename find_jump_threads_backwards to maybe_thread. (pass_early_thread_jumps::execute): Same. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-7.c: Remove call into the legacy code and adjust for ranger threader.
SOrry, I thought I'd already pre-approved this :-) OK jeff
