> But it is okay that we can set a breakpoint on defs__struct1IP, > in the test case of PR 101598. > And the debugger shall only show assembler here. > Right?
The defs__struct1IP procedure should be totally transparent for the user, so setting a breakpoint in it is not supposed to come into play. > Do you have an example where this location information is used in the > compiler itself for debugging? That's useful when you compile the code with -gnatD, i.e when you debug the intermediate code generated by the front-end. > I assume You would agree that having the location for Test2 is better > than no debug info at all? But we want no debug info at all for these IP functions. > What do you think? I guess I still don't understand why DECL_IGNORED_P was changed. -- Eric Botcazou
