> The location of these ignored Ada decls looks completely sane to me. > However, it was an unintentional side effect of the patch to allow > minimal debugging of ignored decls. This means we can now step into > those functions or set line breakpoints there, while previously that > was not possible. And I guess it could be considered an improvement. > > So it's your choice, how you want these functions to be debugged.
The requirement on the GDB side is that these functions *cannot* be stepped into, i.e. that they be completely transparent for the GDB user. But we still want to have location information in the compiler itself to debug it. -- Eric Botcazou
