On 6/28/2021 4:45 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 25.03.2020 23:36, Jeff Law wrote:
I wouldn't mind dropping /usr/tmp. That so antiquated that it'd be
non- controversial. Can you send that as a separate patch.
Behavior for !__NetBSD__ is out of interest.
This is not a very useful approach in a collaborative project like GCC.
Incremental changes (including cleanups) help and are a good way to get
engaged, improve the overall code base, and gain support from others
(who may not have any interest in the __NetBSD__ case, but be willing
to collaborate).
@Jeff, is the following what you had in mind?
It passed testing on i686-unknown-freebsd12; okay to push?
Gerald
commit 8365565396cee65aeb6c2e4bfad74e095a3c388c
Author: Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
Date: Tue Jun 29 00:39:15 2021 +0200
libiberty: No longer use /usr/tmp
/usr/tmp is antiquated and not present on decently modern systems.
Remove it from consideration when choosing a directory for temporary
files.
libiberty:
2021-06-29 Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
* make-temp-file.c (usrtmp): Remove.
(choose_tmpdir): Remove use of usrtmp.
Yup. This is fine. You might consider updating the comment which
references /usr/tmp in choose_tmpdir along the way.
jeff
