On 5/13/21 6:05 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
The change is about error handling.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
PR middle-end/100504
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-attribs.c (handle_target_clones_attribute): Expect a string
argument to target_clone argument.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/pr100504.c: New test.
---
gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c | 6 ++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100504.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100504.c
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
index c1f652d1dc9..9905ee56947 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
@@ -5300,6 +5300,12 @@ handle_target_clones_attribute (tree *node, tree
name, tree ARG_UNUSED (args),
"with %qs attribute", name, "target");
*no_add_attrs = true;
}
+ else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (args)) != STRING_CST)
+ {
+ error ("%qE attribute argument not a string constant", name);
+ *no_add_attrs = true;
+ }
Since errors are higher priority than warnings I'd suggest making
this the first check, before the warnings above, (and adding a test
to verify that that's how it works).
Martin
+
else
/* Do not inline functions with multiple clone targets. */
DECL_UNINLINABLE (*node) = 1;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100504.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100504.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2910dfb948b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100504.c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/* PR middle-end/100504 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+__attribute__((target_clones(0)))
+foo()
+{ /* { dg-error ".target_clones. attribute argument not a string
constant" } */
+}