> In patch form now (for ~ we'd need to use (size_t) ~(size_t) 0 to be > fully portable, I think nothing in the standard requires that size_t isn't > e.g. unsigned char or unsigned short that would then promote to int. > > Ok for trunk? > > 2021-01-31 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > * fold-const-call.c (fold_const_call): Use INTTYPE_MAXIMUM (size_t) > instead of SIZE_MAX.
Why not just: #ifndef SIZE_MAX # define SIZE_MAX INTTYPE_MAXIMUM (size_t) #endif just below UCHAR_MAX in system.h? -- Eric Botcazou
