On 11/30/20 8:50 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:19:32PM +0200, Ville Voutilainen via Gcc-patches
wrote:
OK for trunk if full testsuite passes? Should we consider having some sort
of test that catches such omissions?
IMHO this doesn't require a test.
2020-11-30 Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com>
gcc/
>>
PR c++/98054
* cp/cxx-pretty-print.c (pp_cxx_trait_expression):
Add support for __is_nothrow_{assignable,constructible}.
No "cp/" please.
And change the gcc/ above to gcc/cp/. OK with that change.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
index 058b9c2f4fc..1cdf0772a6b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
@@ -2666,6 +2666,12 @@ pp_cxx_trait_expression (cxx_pretty_printer *pp, tree t)
case CPTK_IS_CONSTRUCTIBLE:
pp_cxx_ws_string (pp, "__is_constructible");
break;
+ case CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_ASSIGNABLE:
+ pp_cxx_ws_string (pp, "__is_nothrow_assignable");
+ break;
+ case CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTIBLE:
+ pp_cxx_ws_string (pp, "__is_nothrow_constructible");
+ break;
default:
gcc_unreachable ();
Looks fine, thanks.
Marek
