On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:19:32PM +0200, Ville Voutilainen via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> OK for trunk if full testsuite passes? Should we consider having some sort
> of test that catches such omissions?
IMHO this doesn't require a test.
> 2020-11-30 Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com>
>
> gcc/
>
> PR c++/98054
> * cp/cxx-pretty-print.c (pp_cxx_trait_expression):
> Add support for __is_nothrow_{assignable,constructible}.
No "cp/" please.
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
> index 058b9c2f4fc..1cdf0772a6b 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
> @@ -2666,6 +2666,12 @@ pp_cxx_trait_expression (cxx_pretty_printer *pp, tree
> t)
> case CPTK_IS_CONSTRUCTIBLE:
> pp_cxx_ws_string (pp, "__is_constructible");
> break;
> + case CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_ASSIGNABLE:
> + pp_cxx_ws_string (pp, "__is_nothrow_assignable");
> + break;
> + case CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTIBLE:
> + pp_cxx_ws_string (pp, "__is_nothrow_constructible");
> + break;
>
> default:
> gcc_unreachable ();
Looks fine, thanks.
Marek
