On 01/04/12 17:16, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 01/04/2012 01:20 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:I fixed this PR, and then it got reopened because the testcase triggered a different problem on Alpha, Mips, and other architectures. The problem is actually totally different than the previous fix for 51472, and has nothing to do with --param tm-max-aggregate-size.Also solve PR/51685 because it is a duplicate. Patrick.
Sweet! Three for one! Adjusted PR as duplicate. Closed the original PR.
