In the testcase below, we pretty print the nested type A<int>::B as
A<int>::B<int> because we don't check that B is itself a class template
before printing the innermost set of template arguments from B's
TEMPLATE_INFO (which in this case belongs to A).  This patch fixes this
by checking PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P beforehand.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK to
commit to trunk and perhaps to the 10 branch?

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/95303
        * cxx-pretty-print.c (pp_cxx_unqualified_id): Check
        PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P before printing the innermost template
        arguments.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/95303
        * g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic14.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c                    | 13 +++----
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic14.C | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic14.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
index 188462a79e7..263f225a492 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
@@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ pp_cxx_unqualified_id (cxx_pretty_printer *pp, tree t)
     case UNBOUND_CLASS_TEMPLATE:
       pp_cxx_unqualified_id (pp, TYPE_NAME (t));
       if (tree ti = TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO_MAYBE_ALIAS (t))
-       {
-         pp_cxx_begin_template_argument_list (pp);
-         tree args = INNERMOST_TEMPLATE_ARGS (TI_ARGS (ti));
-         pp_cxx_template_argument_list (pp, args);
-         pp_cxx_end_template_argument_list (pp);
-       }
+       if (PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (TI_TEMPLATE (ti)))
+         {
+           pp_cxx_begin_template_argument_list (pp);
+           tree args = INNERMOST_TEMPLATE_ARGS (TI_ARGS (ti));
+           pp_cxx_template_argument_list (pp, args);
+           pp_cxx_end_template_argument_list (pp);
+         }
       break;
 
     case BIT_NOT_EXPR:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic14.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic14.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ec2b68c4a3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic14.C
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// PR c++/95303
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class>
+struct A {
+    struct B {};
+};
+
+template<class T>
+  requires __is_same(T, char)
+struct A<T> {
+    struct B {};
+};
+
+template<>
+  struct A<bool> {
+    struct B {};
+  };
+
+template<class T>
+concept C = requires (T&& t) { // { dg-message "\\\[with T = A<int>::B\\\]" }
+    t.a;
+};
+static_assert(C<A<int>::B>); // { dg-error "failed" }
+
+template<class T>
+concept D = requires (T&& t) { // { dg-message "\\\[with T = A<char>::B\\\]" }
+    t.a;
+};
+static_assert(D<A<char>::B>); // { dg-error "failed" }
+
+template<class T>
+concept E = requires (T&& t) { // { dg-message "\\\[with T = A<bool>::B\\\]" }
+    t.a;
+};
+static_assert(E<A<bool>::B>); // { dg-error "failed" }
-- 
2.27.0.203.gf402ea6816

Reply via email to