Hi Kwok! On 2020-06-10T17:23:58+0100, Kwok Cheung Yeung <k...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 10/06/2020 4:15 pm, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> On 6/10/20 3:34 PM, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote: >>> This patch updates the previous entry on the website for devel/omp/gcc-9 to >>> refer to the new branch instead. This removes references to the old branch, >>> as >>> new development should occur on the newer branch. >> >> Can you move the old entry to "Inactive Development Branches" instead? > > The inactive development branches are sorted alphabetically except for the > openacc-gcc-*-branch entries, which are grouped with the gomp*-branch entries. > Would it be better to place devel/omp/gcc-9 alphabetically (in which case it > will go between debuglocus and dwarf4)
For obvious reasons, very most of all items on this list of inactive development branches pre-date the Git conversion, which is when we added the convention that shared development branches go into the 'devel/' namespace. So the current list does not reflect that current practice, so given old practice, the 'devel/omp/gcc-9' etc. branches wouldn't sort into 'd' but into 'o'. > or by topic (in which case it should > probably go after openacc-gcc-9-branch)? By topic makes most sense to me. And, 'devel/omp/gcc-9' definitively should group right next to 'openacc-gcc-9-branch', as it began as a direct translation of the latter. For historical reasons, I have a (at least slight) preference to keep all these branches right after the 'gomp-4_0-branch' -- where it all began. This is a history chapter, after all. And anyway, changing any of that would be a separate thing from simply documenting the new 'devel/omp/gcc-10' branch, and retiring the 'devel/omp/gcc-9' branch. Grüße Thomas ----------------- Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München / Germany Registergericht München HRB 106955, Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Alexander Walter
