* Martin Liška:
> The patch adds new no_stack_protect attribute. The change is requested
> from kernel folks and is direct equivalent of Clang's no_stack_protector.
> Unlike Clang, I chose to name it no_stack_protect because we already
> have stack_protect attribute (used with -fstack-protector-explicit).
>
> First part of the patch contains a small refactoring of an enum, second
> implements the functionality.
In glibc, we already have this:
/* Used to disable stack protection in sensitive places, like ifunc
resolvers and early static TLS init. */
#ifdef HAVE_CC_NO_STACK_PROTECTOR
# define inhibit_stack_protector \
__attribute__ ((__optimize__ ("-fno-stack-protector")))
#else
# define inhibit_stack_protector
#endif
Is it broken?
Thanks,
Florian
