On 3/25/20 3:46 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi,
Iain Sandoe <develo...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> wrote:
This is the first of two remaining changes needed to bring the GCC
implementation into line with the standard draft at n4849.
Here is a revised version with the “initial await resume called” variable
renamed to be more consistent, as we discussed off-list.
+ /* n4849 adds specific behaviour to treat exceptions thrown by the
+ await_resume () of the initial suspend expression. In order to
+ implement this, we need to treat the initial_suspend expression
+ as if it were part of the user's authored function body. This
(channelling Sandra) user-authored, I think?
only need to exercise the initial
Otherwise fine -- no cognative dissonance on variable name vs meaning :)
ok, thanks
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
