Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote on 15/12/2011 09:56:12 AM:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Michael Zolotukhin > <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks! > > Fixed patch is attached. > > > > Any other comments? > > > > Changelog: > > 2011-12-14 Michael Zolotukhin <michael.v.zolotuk...@intel.com> > > > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-31.c: Adjust array > size and test > > diag-scans to fix fail on AVX. > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-36.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-66.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-68.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-dv-2.c: Adjust dg-scans. > > * gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-35.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-6-big-array.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-6.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-91.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-all-big-array.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-all.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-4c.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-5.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-1.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-3.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-4.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-1.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-2.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-pattern-1b.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-pattern-1c.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-pattern-2b.c: Ditto. > > * gcc.dg/vect/wrapv-vect-reduc-pattern-2c.c: Ditto. > > * lib/target-supports.exp > (check_effective_target_vect_any_perm): New function. > > (check_avx_available): Ditto. > > (check_effective_target_vect_sizes_32B_16B): Ditto. > > (check_prefer_avx128): Ditto. > > (check_effective_target_vect_aligned_arrays): Add handling of AVX. > > (check_effective_target_vect_multiple_sizes): Ditto. > > Looks OK to me, the patch needs final approval from vectorizer > manintainer (I propose that we go ahead with the patch, fixing any > remaining problems with incremental patch.) Fine with me. Ira > > Thanks, > Uros. >
