Hi, On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 21:23, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 18:59 +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Feb 18 2020, Feng Xue OS wrote: > > > Currently, for self-recursive call, we never use value originated from > > > non-passthrough > > > jump function as source to avoid propagation explosion, but > > > self-dependent value is > > > missed. This patch is made to fix the bug. > > > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux. > > > > > > Feng > > > --- > > > 2020-02-18 Feng Xue <f...@os.amperecomputing.com> > > > > > > PR ipa/93763 > > > * ipa-cp.c (self_recursively_generated_p): Mark self-dependent > > > value as > > > self-recursively generated. > > > > Honza, this is OK. > Thanks. I went ahead and installed Feng's patch. >
I'm seeing errors with the new testcase: end of struct or union /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:8:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:8:1: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'e' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:8:4: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'k' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:8:7: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'ah' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:8:11: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'al' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:9:1: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:9:1: warning: type of 'aa' defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:14:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'h' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:16:1: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:19:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'i' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:22:1: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:25:1: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:27:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'j' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:29:1: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:33:1: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:45:6: warning: passing argument 1 of 'ai' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr93763.c:45:10: warning: passing argument 2 of 'ai' I thought I could fix what seemed obvious typos, but it seems the testcase is bogus (missing types, incompatible arguments, ....) I'm probably missing something, but I'm not the only one according to gcc-testresults: that test fails on many targets. Christophe > jeff > > >
