On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 6:41 AM Alexander Monakov <amona...@ispras.ru> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > Bare IFUNC's don't seem to have this restriction. Why do we want to > > > constrain target clones this way? > > > > > > > foo's resolver acts as foo. It should have the same visibility as foo. > > What do you mean by that? From the implementation standpoint, there's > two symbols of different type with the same value. There's no problem > allowing one of them have local binding and the other have global binding. > > Is there something special about target clones that doesn't come into > play with ifuncs? >
I stand corrected. Resolver should be static and it shouldn't be weak. -- H.J.
