Re: [PATCH] Make target_clones resolver fn static.

[Alexander Monakov]

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, H.J. Lu wrote:

> > Bare IFUNC's don't seem to have this restriction. Why do we want to
> > constrain target clones this way?
> >
> 
> foo's resolver acts as foo.  It should have the same visibility as foo.

What do you mean by that? From the implementation standpoint, there's
two symbols of different type with the same value. There's no problem
allowing one of them have local binding and the other have global binding.

Is there something special about target clones that doesn't come into
play with ifuncs?

Alexander