Hi.
The patch is fixes a regression in libgcrypt package where
we incorrectly forget to stream out a definition of a no-reorder symbol.
It's caused by LTO balanced map reversion, where we do not revert
also best_noreorder_pos.
It's pre-approved patch by Honza and I'm going to install it.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/lto/ChangeLog:
2020-01-16 Martin Liska <[email protected]>
* lto-partition.c (lto_balanced_map): Remember
best_noreorder_pos and then restore to it
when we revert.
---
gcc/lto/lto-partition.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c b/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c
index 3a9990903c7..8e0488ab13e 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c
+++ b/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c
@@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ void
lto_balanced_map (int n_lto_partitions, int max_partition_size)
{
int n_varpool_nodes = 0, varpool_pos = 0, best_varpool_pos = 0;
+ int best_noreorder_pos = 0;
auto_vec <cgraph_node *> order (symtab->cgraph_count);
auto_vec<cgraph_node *> noreorder;
auto_vec<varpool_node *> varpool_order;
@@ -732,6 +733,7 @@ lto_balanced_map (int n_lto_partitions, int max_partition_size)
best_i = i;
best_n_nodes = lto_symtab_encoder_size (partition->encoder);
best_varpool_pos = varpool_pos;
+ best_noreorder_pos = noreorder_pos;
}
if (dump_file)
fprintf (dump_file, "Step %i: added %s, size %i, "
@@ -752,6 +754,7 @@ lto_balanced_map (int n_lto_partitions, int max_partition_size)
i - best_i, best_i);
undo_partition (partition, best_n_nodes);
varpool_pos = best_varpool_pos;
+ noreorder_pos = best_noreorder_pos;
}
gcc_assert (best_size == partition->insns);
i = best_i;