On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 at 15:45, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 03:41:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > The new test fails on aarch64: > > g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++14 (internal compiler error) > > g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) > > g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) > > g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) > > g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++2a (internal compiler error) > > g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) > > > > The log says: > > during RTL pass: reload > > /gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C: In function 'array<__vector(4) > > float, > > 4> transpose(array<__vector(4) float, 4>)': > > /gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C:25:1: internal compiler error: > > maximum > > number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90) > > That doesn't seem to be a fault of the patch that went in, but either a > backend bug or LRA bug. > So: > > Please submit a full bug report, >
OK, I've filed PR93135. > ... > > Thanks. > > Jakub > >
