On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 21:28, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:

> In r268428 I changed reshape_init_r in such a way that when it sees
> a nested { } in a CONSTRUCTOR with missing braces, it just returns
> the initializer:
> +     else if (COMPOUND_LITERAL_P (stripped_init)
> ...
> +         ++d->cur;
> +         gcc_assert (!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (stripped_init));
> +         return init;
>
> But as this test shows, that's incorrect: if TYPE is an array, we need
> to proceed to reshape_init_array_1 which will iterate over the array
> initializers:
>  6006   /* Loop until there are no more initializers.  */
>  6007   for (index = 0;
>  6008        d->cur != d->end && (!sized_array_p || index <=
> max_index_cst);
>  6009        ++index)
>  6010     {
> and update d.cur accordingly.  In other words, when reshape_init gets
>
> {{col[0][0], col[1][0], col[2][0], col[3][0]},
>  {col[0][1], col[1][1], col[2][1], col[3][1]},
>  {col[0][2], col[1][2], col[2][2], col[3][2]},
>  {col[0][3], col[1][3], col[2][3], col[3][3]}}
>
> we recurse on the first element:
>   {col[0][0], col[1][0], col[2][0], col[3][0]}
> and we can't just move d.cur to point to
>   {col[0][1], col[1][1], col[2][1], col[3][1]}
> and return; we need to iterate, so that d.cur ends up being properly
> updated, and after all initializers have been seen, points to d.end.
> Currently we skip the loop, wherefore we hit this:
>
>  6502   /* Make sure all the element of the constructor were used.
> Otherwise,
>  6503      issue an error about exceeding initializers.  */
>  6504   if (d.cur != d.end)
>  6505     {
>  6506       if (complain & tf_error)
>  6507         error ("too many initializers for %qT", type);
>  6508       return error_mark_node;
>  6509     }
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, built cmcstl2, ok for trunk
> and branches?
>
> 2019-12-20  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>
>
>         PR c++/92745 - bogus error when initializing array of vectors.
>         * decl.c (reshape_init_r): For a nested compound literal, do
>         call reshape_init_{class,array,vector}.
>
>         * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C: New test.
>
> Hi,

The new test fails on aarch64:
    g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C  -std=c++14 (internal compiler error)
    g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C  -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
    g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C  -std=c++17 (internal compiler error)
    g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C  -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
    g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C  -std=c++2a (internal compiler error)
    g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C  -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)

The log says:
during RTL pass: reload
/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C: In function 'array<__vector(4)
float,
 4> transpose(array<__vector(4) float, 4>)':
/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C:25:1: internal compiler error:
maximum
 number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)
0xd7686f lra_constraints(bool)
        /gcc/lra-constraints.c:4946
0xd5d834 lra(_IO_FILE*)
        /gcc/lra.c:2437
0xd10209 do_reload
        /gcc/ira.c:5526
0xd10209 execute
        /gcc/ira.c:5712
Please submit a full bug report,

Christophe

 diff --git gcc/cp/decl.c gcc/cp/decl.c
> index 7d4c947fb58..c15cbfa3bd3 100644
> --- gcc/cp/decl.c
> +++ gcc/cp/decl.c
> @@ -6399,14 +6399,13 @@ reshape_init_r (tree type, reshape_iter *d, bool
> first_initializer_p,
>                by the front end.  Here we have e.g. {.__pfn=0B,
> .__delta=0},
>                which is missing outermost braces.  We should warn below,
> and
>                one of the routines below will wrap it in additional { }.
> */;
> -         /* For a nested compound literal, there is no need to reshape
> since
> -            we called reshape_init in finish_compound_literal, before
> calling
> -            digest_init.  */
> -         else if (COMPOUND_LITERAL_P (stripped_init)
> -                  /* Similarly, a CONSTRUCTOR of the target's type is a
> -                     previously digested initializer.  */
> -                  || same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (type,
> -
> init_type))
> +         /* For a nested compound literal, proceed to specialized
> routines,
> +            to handle initialization of arrays and similar.  */
> +         else if (COMPOUND_LITERAL_P (stripped_init))
> +           gcc_assert (!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (stripped_init));
> +         /* A CONSTRUCTOR of the target's type is a previously
> +            digested initializer.  */
> +         else if (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (type,
> init_type))
>             {
>               ++d->cur;
>               gcc_assert (!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (stripped_init));
> diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..2e1b96953e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist118.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// PR c++/92745 - bogus error when initializing array of vectors.
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +template <typename a, int b> struct c {
> +  typedef a d[b];
> +};
> +
> +template <typename a, int b> struct array {
> +  typename c<a, b>::d e;
> +  a operator[](long);
> +};
> +
> +template<class T>
> +using vec4_t __attribute__((vector_size(4*sizeof(T)))) = float;
> +
> +array<vec4_t<float>, 4>
> +transpose(array<vec4_t<float>, 4> col)
> +{
> +  array<vec4_t<float>, 4>
> +    ret{vec4_t<float>{col[0][0], col[1][0], col[2][0], col[3][0]},
> +        vec4_t<float>{col[0][1], col[1][1], col[2][1], col[3][1]},
> +        vec4_t<float>{col[0][2], col[1][2], col[2][2], col[3][2]},
> +        vec4_t<float>{col[0][3], col[1][3], col[2][3], col[3][3]}};
> +  return ret;
> +}
>
>

Reply via email to